By Michael Phillips

For decades, the legal profession has operated under a comforting illusion: that the judiciary and its affiliated bar associations are paragons of integrity, immune to the corruption, conflicts of interest, and self-serving behavior that plague other arms of power. But recent headlines are chipping away at that narrative — and fast.

Thanks to watchdog voices, whistleblowers, and a handful of legal journalists willing to lift the curtain, we’re starting to see just how deep the rot goes.

The NJ “Supreme” Conflict of Interest

Take New Jersey. The New Jersey Law Journal recently ran a piece titled “Separation of Powers Under the New Jersey Constitution Protects the Independence of the Bar.” Sounds like a noble defense of professional standards — until you look closer.

The article hinges on the Supreme Court of New Jersey’s unique and exclusive authority to regulate the state’s lawyers. In plain language: the judges control the lawyers, the lawyers owe their careers to the judges, and everyone pretends this isn’t a glaring conflict of interest.

In other words, good luck getting a fair hearing if your attorney is up against a judge they have to answer to — or fear retaliation from. It’s the textbook definition of judicial capture.

And then there’s the icing on the cake: New Jersey’s Bench-Bar Conferences — week-long gatherings at vacation spots where judges and lawyers cozy up under the pretense of professional development. We’re told no cases are discussed. Just like we were told family court operates in the “best interest of the child.”

Pull the other one.

Selective Outrage: When Judges Break the Law

Meanwhile, the legal press is buzzing over the arrest of Wisconsin Judge Hannah Dugan, who reportedly allowed an undocumented immigrant to escape ICE through the back door of her chambers. She’s now facing serious federal charges for obstruction and harboring.

Her defense? Judicial immunity.

Let that sink in. A judge, allegedly committing a federal crime in her courtroom, claims protection not because she didn’t do it — but because of her title. And yet, this is the same legal ecosystem where a father texting his ex-wife to see his child gets hit with a restraining order.

The hypocrisy isn’t just obvious — it’s insulting.

Investigate the People, Not the Power

Another recent headline featured U.S. District Attorney Alina Haba’s investigation of New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy, who declared that no law enforcement agency in his state would assist ICE. Legal “experts” rushed to claim that such a probe was improper because it targeted a public official’s statements.

That’s rich. Fathers and parents in family court are routinely investigated, shamed, and punished over text messages, social media posts, or frustrated emails. But when a politician says something that potentially violates federal law? Now the bar draws the line.

So let me get this straight: ordinary citizens have zero margin for emotional expression, but public officials are untouchable? The double standard isn’t just alive — it’s thriving.

The Domestic Violence Pipeline: Weaponized Allegations

And let’s not forget where this all ties back: the weaponization of domestic violence allegations in family court.

• Over 75% of DV allegations are unproven or later dismissed.
• 80% occur alongside or shortly after divorce filings.
• The majority are based on vague “harassment” claims — often just parents trying to contact one another about their children.

Yet those mere accusations trigger the full weight of the legal system: protective orders, custody loss, supervised visitation, legal fees, and public shaming — all without a criminal conviction. Meanwhile, the accuser faces zero consequences if the claims are false.

Let’s flip that: imagine if every false accusation carried real penalties — perjury charges, custody loss, fines, even jail time. The courtroom would look very different.

Time’s Up for the Untouchables

The legal industry — judges, bar associations, political allies, and all — has had a long, comfortable run of self-policing, self-protecting, and self-dealing. But the truth is catching up. Fast.

Parents, litigants, and everyday citizens are waking up to how the game is rigged. And thanks to more media attention, leaked rulings, and brave voices stepping forward, the cracks in the system are widening.

The chickens are coming home to roost. The only question now is: will the system reform itself before it completely collapses under the weight of its own hypocrisy?

Either way, one thing is clear: the people are watching now.

---

If you’ve experienced family court injustice or want to share your story, leave a comment or reach out. This isn’t just a legal issue — it’s a human one.

Author’s Note:

Special thanks to Bruce Eden whose research, caselaw review, and personal insight into the financialization of family law helped shape the foundation of this article. Your work continues to educate and inspire those fighting for transparency and reform.

Support the Work. Fuel the Fight.

If this article hit home, consider supporting independent journalism and advocacy. Your donations help keep these stories alive and expose the systems that silence us.

👉 Donate here
👉 Grab powerful court templates, guides, and resources on Gumroad

Every dollar helps push back against a system that’s rigged — and build something better in its place. Thank you for being part of the movement.